Articles, Blog

Real Lawyer Reacts to Bee Movie (Honey Trial Against Humanity – Class Action) // LegalEagle

October 31, 2019


– Thanks to CuriosityStream
for keeping LegalEagle and bees everywhere in the air. – He’s denouncing bees. – And don’t y’all date your cousins? – Objection. – Ah, the non-lawyer makes an objection. (playful music) Hey, LegalEagles, it’s time
to think like a lawyer. Today we are covering the
highly requested Bee Movie, an animated movie about
bees that sue humanity for stealing their honey. I think this is the movie
I was born to review. Be sure to comment in
the form of an objection, which I will either sustain or overrule, and stick around until
the end of this video where I will give the Bee Movie
a grade for legal realism. So, without further ado,
let’s dig in to the Bee Movie. (dramatic news music) – Good evening, I’m Bob Bumble. – And I’m Jeanette Chung. – Our top story, a
tri-county bee, Barry Benson, is saying he intends to sue the human race for stealing our honey, packaging it, and profiting from it illegally. – All right, so, right out of the gate, big problem with Barry’s lawsuit: you cannot sue the entire human race. To sue a party in court, they have to be a recognizable
entity that can be sued, an individual, a corporation. Who would show up? Who would hire the attorneys? Who would be the material
witnesses in this case? All of those are reasons why
the human race is not a party that has standing to be sued in court. But it’s similar to when
people have tried to sue God in federal and state court. Every few years you
get one of these jokers who thinks it would be cute
to name God as a party, and every time it is rejected. Sometimes the courts just
dismiss the case out of hand because there’s no way
to properly notify God because God doesn’t have a fixed address to accept service of the lawsuit, and other times they will
let the lawsuit go forward and let the case go into
what’s called default, which means that the
propounding party wins because the other party didn’t respond. But the problem is
there’s no way to recover whatever winnings you might
be entitled to from God, so it’s a Pyrrhic victory in either case. – [Barry] Quiet please,
actual work going on here. – Is that that same bee? – [Barry] Yes, it is. – I’m helping him sue the human race. – What? – Okay, so not only can
an individual not sue the entire human race because
that lawsuit would fail, a florist cannot help you
sue another party in court. That is called the
unauthorized practice of law. So, she can actually
get herself into trouble for practicing law when she
doesn’t have a law license. – Maybe this could make
up for it a little bit. You know, Barry, this
lawsuit’s a pretty big deal. – [Barry] I guess. – Are you sure that you
wanna go through with it? – Am I sure? When I’m done with the humans,
they won’t be able to say honey, I’m home without paying a royalty. (dramatic music) – Okay, well, one of the
reasons you hire an attorney is so that you can file your complaint that starts the lawsuit in a
way that the court will accept. You cannot mail in your
complaint to most courts. You have to actually go
down to the courthouse, file the complaint itself, and serve that complaint on other people. Here, what Vanessa has done
is she’s just put a document into the mail, mailed it to the court, and nothing is going to happen. They will probably just throw that out because that’s not the
proper way to start a lawsuit in New York. Also, if we can rewind it, we can see that she’s also
addressed the complaint to the wrong place. She has addressed her complaint to the Superior Court of New York. Now, while the Superior
Court is the correct court in California, the trial court in New York is actually called the Supreme Court. I think the writers for the Bee Movie probably work in Los
Angeles or California, where you call the trial
court the Superior Court. That’s not the case in New York, so there are many, many reasons why this complaint would be rejected
by the court in New York. – All right, case number 4475,
Superior Court of New York, Barry Bee Benson versus the honey industry is now in session. Mr. Montgomery, you’re representing the five major food
companies collectively. – A privilege. – Okay, so this is interesting. They actually rolled back the lawsuit when they got to court itself. Instead of suing humanity, they are only suing five
farmers who happen to keep bees and happen to harvest and sell the honey. This lawsuit also doesn’t work, but for slightly different reasons. – Mr. Benson, you’re representing
all bees of the world? (clears throat)
(suspenseful music) – [Audience] Huh? (Barry buzzing) – I’m kidding, I’m kidding. Yes, Your Honor, we’re ready to proceed. – All right, so, what Barry
Benson is trying to do here is what’s called a class action lawsuit, where a few representative plaintiffs claim that they are representative of a larger class of
people, and as a result, they claim that they should be
able to prosecute the lawsuit on behalf of all of those people
who are similarly affected. So, would Barry Benson be
able to proceed further with a class action lawsuit? Well, let’s think like a lawyer. (upbeat rock music) Going with the federal definition, there are some requirements
you have to meet before you’re able to proceed further with a class action lawsuit. In a federal system, this
is governed by Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires you to have one, an adequate class definition. Two, that the class be ascertainable. Three, that there must be numerosity, in other words, a lot of people. Four, there must be commonality amongst all of the class members. Five, there must be typicality between the representative
plaintiffs and the class members. Six, you have to have adequacy of counsel. And seven, you have to meet
some other requirements to show that class action
status is warranted. Here, all of those
requirements are not met. Number one, there is a
terrible class definition. They’ve defined the class as all bees. Well, some bees haven’t
had their honey taken. Some bees have had their
honey taken in different ways. So, the class definition
is necessarily problematic. Number two, the class
has to be ascertainable. There are billions, if not
trillions of bees out there, and there is no way to identify the individually effected bees. Three, numerosity, there’s
a lot of bees out there, that probably would be met. But number four is that
there must be commonality amongst all of the class members, and because different bees
are treated differently, there’s not enough
commonality amongst the class to move forward. Number five, there is no reason to assume that Barry Benson is typical of all of the other class members. Number six, adequacy of counsel
is definitely not there. Barry’s not even a lawyer, so he can’t even proceed
with this proceeding, let alone adequately represent
the actual class members that he’s trying to move forward with. And for the same reasons, all of the other requirements of Rule 23 are not met as well. So, basically, this class action is absolutely doomed to fail and it would not move forward
in any way whatsoever. (sighing) – And Mr. Montgomery, your
opening statement, please. – Opening statement? You don’t go straight
from the first hearing and filing a complaint right into trial. That’s totally ridiculous. There would be years of pretrial discovery and motion practice before
you even got to trial, let alone trial happening
on the first day. – Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my grandmother was a simple woman. – Why is there a jury in this case? That also doesn’t make sense. And I’ve mentioned this
a million times before, you don’t get to go
straight from counsel table, walk right into the well of the court, and then go straight at the jury. Judges and juries really hate it when you invade the
personal space of the jury, and if you are aggressive about it, the bailiff will tackle you. – Talking bee. How do we know this isn’t some sort of holographic motion picture
capture Hollywood wizardry? They could be using laser beams. (jury gasping) Robotics, ventriloquism, cloning. For all we know, he could be on steroids. (all gasping) – That is completely improper argument and would be stricken from the record. – [Judge] Mr. Benson. – Again, he’s not a lawyer, he doesn’t get to give
an opening statement. – Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, there’s no trickery here. I’m just an ordinary bee. – And again, you don’t get to fly straight from counsel
table directly to the ledge in front of the jury and then
give your opening statement. You’re invading the
personal space of the jury, and both the jury and the judge
are not going to allow that. – And as a bee, honey’s
pretty important to me. It’s important to all bees. We invented it. We make it and we protect
it with our lives. Unfortunately, there are
some people in this room who think they can take
whatever they want from us because we’re the little guys. And what I’m hoping is that
after this is all over, you’ll see how by taking our honey, you’re not only taking
away everything we have, but everything we are. – Okay, so, um, so, bees are what we refer to
in the legal world as chattel. Almost all animals are. It means that they are animate objects that are owned by some other human. And it is fully within the right
of the owner of the chattel to get the fruits of
those particular animals, whether it’s milk from cows, or whether it’s eggs from
chicken, or honey from bees. If you own those animals, generally, you are entitled
to what they produce. But if bees somehow were able to prove that they were conscious
and fully sentient, then they might have
a conceivable argument that taking honey from them is
a form of conversion or theft to which they would be
entitled to some compensation. Animal rights activists
have tried to give rights to lots of different animals
in different contexts. For example, the famous selfie picture that was taken by a particular monkey. (playful music)
(monkey squawking) But until that time, animals do not have the
same rights as humans. They cannot file a lawsuit, they cannot defend themselves in court, and they do not have property rights. – So, Mr. Klauss
Vanderhayden of Honey Farms, pretty big company you have there. – I suppose so. – And I see you also own Honeyburton, and Honron!
(jury gasping) – Yes, they provide–
– Relevance. – For our farms. – Beekeeper, I find that to
be a very disturbing term, I have to say. I don’t imagine you employ
any beefreers, do you? – No.
– I’m sorry– – Objection, argumentative. – No.
– No. Because you don’t free
bees, you keep bees. – Objection, argumentative. – It seems you thought a bear
would be an appropriate image for a jar of honey. – Well, they’re very lovable creatures. – Objection, relevance? Why is this relevant? – Build-A-Bear?
– Yeah, you mean like this? (bear growling)
(people screaming) Bears kill bees! – All right, so, in addition
to being completely irrelevant to the court proceedings, I
probably don’t need to tell you that when you bring a
demonstrative into court, this is a demonstrative, something
that you bring into court for demonstration of some particular idea, it cannot be a lethal
animal, it cannot be really, probably any animal at all
unless it was like a service dog. This is completely improper. This would be thrown out immediately, and probably a mistrial declared. – [Barry] Well, I just
think it was awfully nice of that bear to pitch in like that. – I’m telling you, I think
the jury’s on our side. – Are we doing everything
right, you know, legally? – I’m a florist. – Exactly, she’s a florist. Why is she sitting at counsel table? Why is she helping with this lawsuit? That is the unauthorized practice of law. – You know, I just about had
it with your little mind games. – What’s that? – Italian Vogue. – Mama mia, that’s a lot of pages. – It’s a lot of ads. – Remember what Van said. Why is your life any
more valuable than mine? – That’s funny, I just
can’t seem to recall that. (Barry yelps) I think something stinks in here. – So we learned earlier in the movie that bees cannot be struck by
paper of more than 30 pages. In a world where bees are
sentient and conscious, I think attacking a bee
with a magazine of that size is probably attempted murder. So, you know, tell that
to all your kids, I guess. – Mr. Benson Bee, I’ll ask you what I think
we’d all like to know. What exactly is your
relationship to that woman? (Vanessa gasps) – Relevance, character? – Good friends?
– Yes. – How good? Do you live together?
– Wait a minute, this isn’t about–
– Are you her little (clears throat)
bedbug? – Hey, that’s not the kind–
– I’ve seen a bee documentary. – People and bees should be
making objections right now. – Queen give birth to all the
bee children in the hives? – Yeah, but– – So those aren’t even your real parents. – Oh Barry.
– Yes, they are. – Improper, character, relevance. – An illegitimate bee, aren’t you, Benson? – He’s denouncing bees. – And don’t y’all date your cousins? – Objection.
– I’m gonna pincushion– – Ah, the non-lawyer makes an objection. (Barry gasps)
(dramatic music) – Adam, don’t, it’s what he wants. (Adam groans) – Oh, I’m hit! – Didn’t that bee just commit suicide? Important to note that one of the reasons we have a
legal system in the first place is so that we don’t
have to rely on violence to solve our problems. And the bees here are
supposed to be the good guys. They’re trying to get just
outcome from their lawsuit, and yet, the bee co-counsel
here has given in to his aggression and he has
attacked the opposing party, the opposing attorney,
with his venomous stinger. That’s not something that you would want an officer of the court to do, and if in fact he was a real lawyer, he’d probably get disbarred for that. – And assuming you’ve
done step 29 correctly, you’re ready for the tub. – Yeah, you don’t get to
talk to the jury like that without the presence of the judge. – Mr. Flayman. – Yes, yes, yes, Your Honor. – [Judge] Where is the rest of your team? – Uh, well, Your Honor, it’s interesting. You know, bees are trained
to fly kind of haphazardly, and as a result, quite often,
we don’t make very good time. – So, I should point out,
if you are not in court when the judge tells you to be in court, you’re in a world of hurt. Judges hate it when lawyers
don’t show up on time. They can issue sanctions,
and in the worst case, they can dismiss your case
for not showing up on time. You know, and on further inspection, that co-counsel bee has
attacked the opposing counsel. There is absolutely no way that he would be allowed to
sit at counsel table anymore. Number one, he would be arrested. Number two, the judge would
probably have to declare a mistrial because of the
outburst that occurred. It’s not fair to either
party to have to proceed with a tainted jury as a result
of the lawyer’s bad conduct in assaulting each other. – How much longer are we going to allow these absurd shenanigans to go on? They have presented no compelling evidence to support their charges
against my clients, who all run perfectly
legitimate businesses. I move for a complete
dismissal of this entire case. – So this happens a lot in movies, where the opposing side will say that the other side has
presented no evidence whatsoever and the case should be thrown out. And usually when they say that, it’s at the beginning of the case, when there wouldn’t
actually be any evidence. Here, the plaintiff bees
have had ample opportunity to demonstrate the validity of their case by presenting evidence,
and they simply haven’t. They’ve engaged in a bunch of shenanigans, they have not presented
any relevant evidence, and as a result, the opposing
side here is making a motion to dismiss the case. That is actually something you
can do in a real court case. You can move for what’s called
a directed verdict or a JNOV. It basically just means that the plaintiff hasn’t met their burden and there’s no reason in proceeding into the defendant’s case because the plaintiff hasn’t
met their evidentiary burden in the first place. So this is the first accurate thing that this movie has done. This is the time to make a
motion for a directed verdict. – Where’s your proof? Where’s the evidence? Show me the smoking gun. – Hold it, Your Honor. You want a smoking gun? Here is your smoking gun.
(dramatic music) (jury gasping) – What is that? – It’s a bee smoker. – What, this? This harmless little contraption? This couldn’t hurt a fly, let alone a bee. (smoker hissing)
(bees clamoring) – So this is somewhat relevant evidence. You would use the smoke gun to demonstrate that the
bees haven’t consented to having their honey
taken away from them, which is one of the
elements you have to show for theft or conversion. That being said, there are
so many other hurdles here, that this would be just a
tiny bit of relevant evidence. It really doesn’t get to
the end of the court case, but still, at least it’s
relevant evidence for once. – Ladies and gentlemen,
please free these bees. (all cheering) – Free the bees, free the bees! Free the bees, free the bees! Free the bees! – The court finds in favor of the bees. – Yeah, that’s something
that happens in movies all the time, it does not
happen in real life at all. The judge cannot decide in
the middle of the court case to just grant the verdict
in favor of the plaintiffs. This would be overturned
on appeal immediately because the defendants have
been denied their due process. – [Reporter] Congratulations
on your victory. What are you going to
demand as a settlement? – [Barry] First, we’re gonna
demand a complete shutdown of all bee work camps. – Yeah, that would not happen. – [Barry] Then we wanna
get back all the honey that was ours to begin
with, every last drop. – So, when you win a lawsuit, generally you are entitled
to monetary compensation. You can sometimes get back
the actual physical things that you feel you are entitled to. That is a legal concept
called specific performance. You are getting the defendants to give you the specific thing that you
think you’re entitled to. Generally, that happens
in real estate cases because real estate is always unique, but if it’s possible to
give financial compensation, the court almost always will
give financial compensation. And there’s no reason that the bees couldn’t be
given financial compensation instead of a return of all of the honey. On top of that, all of the
things that they are getting in this potential settlement would never be given by the court, it’s completely unrealistic
and would never happen. – We demand an end to the
glorification of the bear as anything more than a filthy, smelly, bigheaded, bad-breath, stink machine. I believe we’re all aware of
what they do in the woods. (grunting) Wait for my signal. (gun cocks)
– Huh? – [Barry] Take him out. (gun fires)
(Pooh yelps) – He’ll have a little
nausea for a few hours, then he’ll be fine. – Yeah, if you’re entitled to
compensation for your honey, you don’t then get to assault other people for some weird reason. Why the bees hate the bears? That’s a whole separate issue, I guess. – [Barry] And we will no longer tolerate derogatory bee-negative nicknames. – But it’s just a prance-about stage name. – And that’s a First Amendment violation. – [Barry] Health products and la-dee-da human tea
time snack garnishments. (groaning) – And there’s no reason why
an injunction would be granted to prevent people from using the honey that’s already in the stream of commerce. (playful music) Okay, so that’s the Bee Movie,
but how realistic is it? Well, it’s time to give
the Bee Movie a grade for legal realism. (gavel banging) The Bee Movie effectively
gets everything wrong about lawsuits. Bees and florists cannot be lawyers. The process by which the
court proceeded in this case is completely wrong and
would be grounds for appeal. Everything that happened in that case is completely unrealistic. About the only thing they got right was that the opposing
attorney made a motion for a directed verdict
at about the right time. So, I give the Bee Movie a
solid B for legal realism. Actually, I’m just kidding, it gets an F. It’s terrible. It’s the most unrealistic thing
I’ve ever seen in my life. But, you know, kids movie,
so what are you gonna do? – If you don’t move, he
won’t sting you, freeze. – The Bee Movie teaches us that it’s okay to be
curious about your world. It also teaches us that it’s
hard out there for a bee. (Barry yelping) – Help me! – Even though bees can’t sue humanity, they are facing a crisis of extinction. After watching the Bee Movie, I pulled up a great documentary about bees on CuriosityStream called More Than Honey. It talks about this
worldwide bee phenomenon, why bees are in danger and
what we can do about it. – I’m just saying all life has value. You don’t know what
he’s capable of feeling. – Real bees are not as
cute as the Bee Movie, but they still play a vital
role in our ecosystem. If you’re as curious about
the world as Barry Bee Benson, you should check out CuriosityStream. LegalEagles will get a free
account on CuriosityStream for 31 days by clicking on the link below or using the promo code LegalEagle. Using the promo code really
helps out this channel. So click on the link below and check out the greatest
documentaries on the planet. So, do you agree? Leave your objections in the comments, and check out my other
lawyerly reactions over here in this playlist, where
I will see you in court.

100 Comments

  • Reply Imaginary Toast October 22, 2019 at 11:29 pm

    Also why would a Human help Sue the Human Race?

  • Reply legolas from star wars October 22, 2019 at 11:35 pm

    if you sue god for $x a mount and get it awarded and you sell the debt to a debt collector. would it be fraud?

  • Reply Marcus Wade October 22, 2019 at 11:42 pm

    Do Grandma Got Ran Over by a Reindeer Next Please

  • Reply The King October 23, 2019 at 12:01 am

    Objection
    No one subscribe he has 666k subscribers

  • Reply Chocolatecat Gameplay October 23, 2019 at 12:32 am

    So…your one of those nitpicky lawyers.

  • Reply Cameraman06 October 23, 2019 at 12:35 am

    666k subs

  • Reply Aaron Burkeen October 23, 2019 at 1:42 am

    Objection another reason he cannot stand for all bees. Not all bees make honey. Infact most bees do not make honey.

  • Reply Maddox October 23, 2019 at 1:56 am

    666k subs

  • Reply Dim Anonymous October 23, 2019 at 2:24 am

    This lawyer guy looks like the boss from the office.

  • Reply tyler smukowski October 23, 2019 at 3:00 am

    YA LIKE JAZZ

  • Reply Joshua Smith October 23, 2019 at 4:45 am

    I'm just saying he didn't show the best part when Barry says " honey slaves to the white man a" then black guy moves over

  • Reply Cereal Killaz October 23, 2019 at 4:57 am

    I'm fine with saving the honey bees but I wish killer bees go extinct

  • Reply numaTruehome 100 October 23, 2019 at 6:33 am

    I never thought I could learn so much simply from a review of the B-movie

  • Reply Daddydog AKA RUBBER DUCK and PIGEON MASTER October 23, 2019 at 8:27 am

    Wow you must be fun at parties

  • Reply Jake Walsh October 23, 2019 at 1:04 pm

    Objection
    He carnt represent all bees of the world since there are different types of bees

  • Reply Josh Cantrell October 23, 2019 at 1:41 pm

    Objection Bob bumbles mustache is to 70s p** ish

  • Reply Romantic Outlaw October 23, 2019 at 4:21 pm

    Objection: as a beekeeper, I take offense to your claim that bees aren't as cute as in the Bee Movie. Those bees are horrific caricatures of honeybees with no regard to their anatomy at all. I mean for crying out loud, male bees don't even have stingers!

  • Reply MineAndCraft 12 October 23, 2019 at 4:25 pm

    19:32 oof

  • Reply Adrian Chazz October 23, 2019 at 6:10 pm

    17:05 It may be relevant evidence, but OBJECTION! As I have learned from other videos, YOU CANNOT ENTER EVIDENCE INTO COURT WITHOUT IT BEING PREVIOUSLY NOTED AND ADMITTED.

    They friggin' walked in with A GUN and walked straight towards the bench to leave said gun right in front of the Judge.

    (correct me if I'm wrong, I have stated many times that I actually watch this videos for entertainment and I'm NOT an actual lawyer)

    My guess would be that the Bailiff will tackle you.
    (Specially with an Unknown Gun-like looking weapon)

  • Reply destroyer-_-4265 October 23, 2019 at 9:02 pm

    You can't sue god because he's not real.

  • Reply Mason MacDonald October 23, 2019 at 9:03 pm

    Now I want "Real Lawyer Plays Freddy Fazbear's Pizzeria Simulator" because of how the game works.

  • Reply Monica Solano October 23, 2019 at 11:39 pm

    Is no one going to talk about how this guy kind of looks like Paul Rudd?! 😯

  • Reply MaskedKoopaKid1453 October 23, 2019 at 11:49 pm

    Do ghostbusters 2 court case

  • Reply DrogosBaggins October 24, 2019 at 12:06 am

    When getting my law marit badge in the boy scouts, I was the prosecutor in the mock court battle. I had an objection, so I shouted it to the entire court, then had a brain fart and immediately forgot what I was objecting to.

  • Reply The Legend 28 October 24, 2019 at 12:11 am

    So basically real life lawyers are pretty boring

  • Reply Irma Messer October 24, 2019 at 12:17 am

    BY ALL KNOW LAWS OF AVIATION BEES SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO FLY

  • Reply Justin Biege October 24, 2019 at 12:50 am

    Honey bees are an invasive species, making it difficult for other bees and pollinators that lack their speed and numbers. Limiting the population of the honey bee from places they aren't native to would allow the others to flourish again. I will say that climate change is bringing them all down as well, but nobody talks about honey bees being a threat to anything other than those with allergies and careless children. Gotta say, it sucks that agriculture and infestations made this thing my state's insect instead of anything native. Might as well make Wisconsin the land of the emerald ash borer!

  • Reply Mikey O. October 24, 2019 at 1:11 am

    yA lIkE jAzZ?

  • Reply Slimy Scumbag October 24, 2019 at 1:28 am

    What if you arrive early for a trial?

  • Reply Jonathan Robinson October 24, 2019 at 2:00 am

    I never knew I needed to know all the wrong ways Bee Movie was inaccurate.

  • Reply chromaticether October 24, 2019 at 2:37 am

    tbh you should get him to play danganronpa and react to a class trial

  • Reply Obedient Wife October 24, 2019 at 2:54 am

    I would love to see Legal Eagles take on courtroom scenes from SVU. That would be interesting

  • Reply A Username October 24, 2019 at 3:28 am

    You should react to all the military and war crimes committed in Attack on Titan.

  • Reply Jstar338 October 24, 2019 at 4:07 am

    4:42 Mouths "The hell…?"

  • Reply Fuzzy Bunny October 24, 2019 at 4:37 am

    Are you still a lawyer

  • Reply Nether Dominater October 24, 2019 at 5:29 am

    "Real bees are not as cute as the Bee Movie"

    OBJECTION! Real bees are cuter because they are small and mostly covered in fuzz

  • Reply Jake Scribner October 24, 2019 at 6:47 am

    Objection! I thought bee's weren't endangered anymore?

  • Reply L {real life detective} October 24, 2019 at 12:54 pm

    He should have warn a yellow tie lol

  • Reply GnammyHamster October 24, 2019 at 1:58 pm

    Can you make a video about the medieaval trails against aninals? I heard that is a thing and it would be interesting to see how much of it makes sense.

  • Reply Generic Protagonist October 24, 2019 at 3:12 pm

    I don't like honey nor do I sell it, you bee bastards have no case against me. You tiny, fuzzy living kamikazes!

  • Reply Jack Doyle October 24, 2019 at 4:11 pm

    The Bee Movie but every time there’s a legal inaccuracy it speeds up.

  • Reply Buraindo October 24, 2019 at 8:49 pm

    remember when that Bear HELPED you during the trial?

  • Reply Reuben Ogden October 24, 2019 at 8:59 pm

    If only Honey sponsored you…

  • Reply James Pace October 24, 2019 at 9:37 pm

    Do you like jazz?

  • Reply Darrian Yates October 24, 2019 at 10:07 pm

    >_>

    <_<……

    What's the 1st Amendment?😅

  • Reply Pcssfc October 25, 2019 at 2:07 am

    Lol there actually trying to add logic to “The Bee Movie”

  • Reply Anil mehta October 25, 2019 at 2:14 am

    18:31 The bees would likely not be able to receive financial compensation do to the use of different currencies with no reasonable conversion/exchange, so specific performance is likely more reasonable in this instance.

  • Reply Brian Banek October 25, 2019 at 3:29 am

    Bringing a live bear to court is actually the ultimate power move. Clarence Darrow did it all the time

  • Reply Adamantium9001 October 25, 2019 at 4:09 am

    Objection: they could've filed the case pro se.

  • Reply pdlbean October 25, 2019 at 4:29 am

    Objection! Real bees are adorable and MUCH cuter than bees in Bee Movie.

  • Reply S October 25, 2019 at 4:49 am

    You’re pretty cool

  • Reply THANATOS FANATICOS October 25, 2019 at 7:01 am

    Law is still not as illogical as trying to make sense of the mad

  • Reply Bailujen October 25, 2019 at 9:11 am

    I tried to sue god because of his sins

  • Reply S S October 25, 2019 at 12:58 pm

    Have you ever been swarmed

  • Reply Mike H October 25, 2019 at 1:01 pm

    Really…the bee movie.. I'm still waiting for a full video on "And Justice for all"….a movie that is totally about lawyers and the law!!!…I believe that's what you people call a slam dunk!!!….

  • Reply Socks October 25, 2019 at 2:43 pm

    Unauthorized practice of law is just what the government wants to tell you so you cant defend yourself

  • Reply Aosha October 25, 2019 at 3:05 pm

    OBJECTION! Real bees are cuter than the rubbery abominations in this movie.

  • Reply AGENTDB 2 October 25, 2019 at 4:35 pm

    OBJECTION! bees' stingers are not venomous, they are simply barbed; the defense co-council would not have survived, and the smoke gun does not cause bees to cough like that, it makes bees sleepy instead

  • Reply MrTingles October 25, 2019 at 10:43 pm

    Today's real life advice for Lawyers: "You're not allowed to fly from the council table in the direction of the jury."

  • Reply Hotred505 October 25, 2019 at 10:51 pm

    13:22 isn't that chemical warfare in a way like you said bees are venomous so if he attacks him with venom a chemical. He is participating in chemical warfare or since it's just on one person it doesn't count

  • Reply Feinsanity October 26, 2019 at 4:15 am

    Shhhhh Whispers it's just a movie to shut your kids up

  • Reply Zadok Lorenz October 26, 2019 at 5:12 am

    Objection! (18:35) The bees use the honey as currency and is, therefore, monetary compensation.

  • Reply DawsenScript October 26, 2019 at 5:38 am

    poor Winnie the pooh

  • Reply Dr_Wetness October 26, 2019 at 9:34 am

    Objection: based on my knowledge of the uk mailing system, the law suit she mailed in would be returned to sender as the 1st line of the address does not appear within that postal code making the address invalid meaning it would be returned to sender

  • Reply Brayden Brown October 26, 2019 at 9:36 am

    “I was already a blood-sucking parasite, all I needed was a briefcase”

  • Reply Joshua Waring October 26, 2019 at 10:05 am

    OBJECTION

    How much blood can you suck from people?

  • Reply chilly vena wolf seed HQ October 26, 2019 at 12:25 pm

    This was….. Wholesome….

  • Reply The Blyatman October 26, 2019 at 3:29 pm

    This is gold

  • Reply zadudet1 October 26, 2019 at 4:12 pm

    The specific bees in this movies are facing a crisis(colony collapse), but not all bees. Turns out when they die native bee population rise. So they're basically an invasive species transported by humans.

  • Reply Tyler S. October 26, 2019 at 6:54 pm

    Honron is pretty funny when you remember that Enron did a lot of illegal activity

  • Reply Anton B. Ingibjartsson October 26, 2019 at 6:56 pm

    Objection!
    A phyrric victory is when both sides lose. Since God does not suffer any sort of penalty or need to pay anything, only the sueing party loses (court fees). Hence, it is not a true phyrric victory.

  • Reply Victor Valencia October 26, 2019 at 8:16 pm

    Objection: The bees should have specific performance regardless of the ability for financial performance, because… bees don't use money.

  • Reply DoktorDare October 26, 2019 at 11:50 pm

    Objection! In order for Barry to represent Bees in a case, wouldn't there have to a multiple of other rulings that would grant bees rights to the ownership of their labour and given compensation (no longer chattle) and maybe even citizenship?

    Vanessa could possibly bankroll and hire an attorney on behalf of the bees, but there's a lot of ramifications based just on "bees are sentient and apparently just now finding this out"

    Then the bees could possibly start a business and sell the honey themselves.

  • Reply Epic Twilight October 27, 2019 at 7:05 am

    Please react to the Super Mario Sunshine court cutscene!

  • Reply wikernes October 27, 2019 at 7:17 am

    Mister, you scare me a lot. Awesome video, really educative.

  • Reply Julius G October 27, 2019 at 10:04 am

    Drinking game: take a shot every time the lawyer says "bee." You win if you're still breathing at the end of the video.

  • Reply MisterE. M.P. October 27, 2019 at 2:31 pm

    OBJECTION! There would actually be a viable reason for Barry to fly up to the judge, jury, etc: It is unlikely for a bee to carry their voice across an entire room, meaning that he would have to fly up to them.

  • Reply Montyfatcat October 27, 2019 at 5:55 pm

    What about the court scene in Mississippi Burning?

  • Reply Schollnw29 October 27, 2019 at 10:10 pm

    The bee movie except the bailiff swats barry

  • Reply Max Waller October 27, 2019 at 10:46 pm

    Hear Ye – Hark – Harken – Twitter per suspensions prevents you from examining the tweets and replies of @maxrafaelwaller and @mrwaller3 that are critical in evaluating behavior – Harkened

  • Reply Ebin Delgado October 27, 2019 at 11:55 pm

    I'm not planning to be a lawyer, but these are pretty entertaining

  • Reply Deathshead October 28, 2019 at 1:44 am

    13:23 should’ve yelled alueh akbar

  • Reply Erik Malgren October 28, 2019 at 1:54 pm

    Can anyone explain "Objection: Argumentative?"

  • Reply Kahoobb October 28, 2019 at 7:42 pm

    I wonder if these videos get copyrighted for using audio and video of movies. Usually even 10 seconds will do it.

  • Reply Lily Blackwell October 29, 2019 at 2:42 am

    This is the worst portrayal of a trial I've ever seen in fiction.

  • Reply CHINESE LOBSTER October 29, 2019 at 11:59 am

    Objection

  • Reply AFriendlyBloke October 29, 2019 at 7:10 pm

    Ya like LAW?

  • Reply The Best Buisness Cyan October 29, 2019 at 11:38 pm

    "I was already a blood thirsty parasite, all I needed was a briefcase"

  • Reply TheRealCodeBlack October 29, 2019 at 11:57 pm

    There's something absurdly hilarious about the idea that the reason you can't sue gods is simply because they don't have addresses or reliable means of contact, and so can't be made aware they should appear in court.

  • Reply Plerk Derk October 30, 2019 at 10:38 am

    I feel like my IQ has risen.

  • Reply NearlyH3adlessNick October 30, 2019 at 11:38 am

    Objection!

    Bee's don't run on a gold based economy.
    To expect them to receive compensation in our form of currency is unethical.

  • Reply Galactic Avatar October 30, 2019 at 12:08 pm

    God is judgement-proof.

  • Reply Oh yeah yeah October 30, 2019 at 9:03 pm

    The dude trying to kill the bee with the newspaper sounds like Joe from family Guy

  • Reply Shwoopy Rra Le October 30, 2019 at 9:18 pm

    Fun fact: bees have a language that is entirely temporal in relation to the sun. So they are very timely. It’s how they find flowers, and thus pollen for honey.

  • Reply Matthew Huang October 30, 2019 at 10:05 pm

    Meet Naruto

  • Reply Santiago Castillo October 30, 2019 at 10:15 pm

    Point of order, bees have no use for human money.

  • Reply NicVandEmZ October 31, 2019 at 1:03 am

    Plus if a bee stings someone doesn’t it die after stinging

  • Reply ephram AKA the glitch October 31, 2019 at 1:24 am

    10/10 I got a beltz and beltz lawyer add while watching this xd

  • Reply HotSexyPotato October 31, 2019 at 1:27 am

    your a poopy head and u can not sustain or overrule.

  • Reply Kaldr Nidafjollum October 31, 2019 at 6:57 am

    why is in this recommended and why am I watching it at 2am

  • Leave a Reply